4IRE
Ten projects launched during the 2018-2020 crypto winter, checked against their market cap and status in 2026
01 Oct 2026

Top 10 Projects Launched During Crypto Winter, and Where They Are Now

6 min

Olena PetrashchukCEO

Ten projects that launched during the 2018-2020 crypto winter, checked against their 2026 market cap and status: which held up, and what changed.

Share:

inX

Crypto markets have been through two sustained downturns since 2017: 2018-2020, triggered by the ICO bust and a $530 million hack of the Coincheck exchange in January 2018, and 2022-2023, triggered by the collapse of Terra's UST stablecoin in May 2022 and the failure of FTX that November. Both times, most projects with live products and real users kept building through the decline. This article looks at ten projects that launched during the first of those winters, between 2017 and 2020, and checks where each one stands in October 2026.

What Is a Crypto Winter?

A crypto winter is a sustained, broad decline in crypto asset prices, usually following a period of rapid price growth and new project launches. Market watchers generally point to the same signs:

  • A decline lasting months, not weeks, spread across most major assets, not just one token.
  • Falling new investment in crypto projects and a slower pace of new launches.
  • A round of failures among projects that had no product behind their token, followed by consolidation around the ones that did.

The 2018-2020 winter followed Bitcoin's run to roughly $20,000 in December 2017; by late 2018 it had fallen to around $3,200. The 2022-2023 winter followed Bitcoin's November 2021 peak near $69,000, and the Terra and FTX collapses turned a correction into a crisis of confidence in centralized platforms specifically, not in the underlying technology.

Two crypto winters compared: 2018-2020, triggered by the ICO bust and the $530 million Coincheck hack of January 2018, after Bitcoin ran to roughly $20,000 in December 2017 and fell to around $3,200 by late 2018; and 2022-2023, triggered by the collapse of Terra's UST in May 2022 and the failure of FTX in November, after Bitcoin's November 2021 peak near $69,000

The Lesson: a Downturn Clears Out Weak Projects, Not Working Ones

Both winters removed the same kind of project: ones whose token price, not usage, was the whole business case. LUNA and UST are the clearest case, built on a stablecoin design that needed continuous growth to stay solvent. FTX failed for an unrelated reason, mismanagement and misuse of customer funds at a centralized exchange, which is a governance failure rather than a crypto-winter casualty, but it deepened the 2022 downturn regardless.

What a downturn does not reliably remove is a project with a working product and paying or active users, which is why several projects that launched during the 2018-2020 winter, when funding was hardest to raise and attention was lowest, are still operating, and in most cases still leading their category, in 2026.

10 Projects Launched in the 2018-2020 Crypto Winter, and Where They Stand Now

ProjectLaunchedBuilt forStatus, October 2026
Solana2020High-throughput smart contractsStill a top-tier L1 by usage and market cap ($69.1B, CoinGecko, 1 Oct 2026).
Uniswap2018Automated market-making DEXThe largest on-chain exchange by volume on Ethereum; $5.7B market cap.
Chainlink2019Decentralized oracle networkThe dominant oracle provider for DeFi and tokenized assets; $10.8B market cap.
NEAR Protocol2020Sharded, developer-friendly L1Active sharded mainnet; $6.5B market cap.
Polkadot2020Cross-chain interoperabilityParachains live; migrated to Polkadot Hub in November 2025; $2.0B market cap.
Tezos2018Self-amending proof-of-stake smart contractsTwo protocol upgrades shipped in 2026 (Tallinn, Ushuaia); $349M market cap.
MakerDAO (now Sky)2017Decentralized, overcollateralized stablecoinRebranded to Sky in August 2024, MKR to SKY; $1.9B market cap on the new token.
1inch2019DEX aggregationStill routes trades across many DEXs; $143M market cap.
Axie Infinity2018Play-to-earn NFT gameStill live and updated, but daily players are a fraction of the 2021 peak of 2.7 million; $199M market cap.
Rarible2020General-purpose NFT marketplaceThe marketplace is still trading and expanded onto Solana in August 2026 under new owner IMPOSSIBLE, which bought the brand in June 2026, but its RARI token has fallen to a $3.2M market cap.

Market caps above are from CoinGecko, taken 1 October 2026; they move daily and are included to show scale, not as investment guidance.

Two of the ten are worth a closer look because the project and its token tell different stories. Rarible the marketplace is still operating and growing its chain support, but RARI, its governance token, has fallen more than 99% from its peak: a platform can survive a winter while its token does not. MakerDAO dropped its own name in the August 2024 rebrand to Sky, after most MKR holders chose not to convert to the new SKY token at first; the protocol kept running under either name, but a rebrand carries real risk of its own if the community does not follow.

Project versus token: Rarible's marketplace is still operating and expanded onto Solana in August 2026 under new owner IMPOSSIBLE, but its RARI governance token has fallen more than 99% from its peak; MakerDAO rebranded to Sky in August 2024 after most MKR holders chose not to convert to SKY at first, and the protocol kept running under either name

What This Means for a New Project Today

None of this argues for timing a launch to a downturn on purpose. It argues against waiting for ideal conditions that a cyclical market will not provide. The ten projects above raised money, shipped a working product and kept their users through a funding drought most startups never face. A team with the same discipline does not need a bull market to get started; it needs a product people will use regardless of where the price chart is.

Two traits separate the projects on this list from the ones that did not make it past 2020. Each either shipped its mainnet or reached a usable product during the downturn itself, without waiting for better conditions to launch. And each had a revenue or usage model that did not depend on its own token price staying high, whether that was trading fees, protocol fees or demand for the service itself. Neither trait requires a bull market; both require a product worth using before the market decides to notice.

Two traits of the projects that survived the crypto winter: each shipped its mainnet or reached a usable product during the downturn itself, and each had a revenue or usage model that did not depend on its own token price staying high, such as trading fees, protocol fees or demand for the service

FAQ